Prosodic Markings of Complex NP Focus, Syntax, and the Pre-/Post-focus String
نویسنده
چکیده
The prosodic realization of focus can vary depending on various factors such as type of focus (e.g., information focus, corrective focus), morphosyntax (whether or not a language has a morpho-syntactic marker of focus), and intonational phonology of language, and thus is language-specific. On one hand, head-prominence languages such as English, German, and Greek, mark prominence through the use of pitch accent (i.e., salient pitch movement on the stressed syllable), and the focused word receives a nuclear pitch accent, “deaccenting” the following word(s). On the other hand, edge prominencelanguages such as Korean and Japanese mark prominence by manipulating the phrasing (i.e., grouping) of words, Lastly, languages such as Bengali and French, considered both headand edge-prominence languages, prominence is marked by both pitch accent and phrasing (Jun 2005). Prosodic realizations of focus also differ by domain (i.e., whether the focus domain is a single word or a phrase) and the syntactic type of constituent (i.e., whether it’s an NP or VP). In the case of VP focus in English, e.g., (1c), studies have shown that nuclear pitch accent is given on the VP-final argument, thus similar to the case with the final argument having narrow focus (Gussenhoven 1983; Birch & Clifton 1995; Welby 2003), though more recent studies have revealed some differences in the pitch accent types and the realization of pre-nuclear pitch accent (Baumann, Becker, Grice, & Mücke 2008; Breen, Fedorenko, Wagner, & Gibson submitted; Jun in progress). In the case of VP focus in Korean, Jun, Kim, Lee, & Kim (2006) and Jun & Kim (2007) have shown that the VP-initial argument receives the strongest prominence, while all following lexical items, sometimes even the verb, still receive prominence. That is, no dephrasing happens after the initial argument. This differs from the case where the VP-initial argument receives narrow focus. In that case, a strong phrase boundary is inserted at the beginning of the focused argument, and all items after the focused argument are either dephrased (i.e., phrase boundaries are deleted) or realized in substantially reduced pitch range. Prosodic realizations of NP focus differ from VP focus and also vary across languages. In Neapolitan Italian declaratives, each word in a focused NP is marked by a rising (L+H*) nuclear pitch
منابع مشابه
Prosodic (non-)realisation of broad, narrow and contrastive focus in Hungarian: a production and a perception study
In languages with variable focus positions, prominent elements tend to be emphasised by prosodic cues (e.g. English). If a language prefers a given prosodic pattern, i.e. sentence-final nuclear accents, like Spanish, the prosodic realisation of broad focus might not differ from that of narrow and contrastive focus. The relevance of prosodic focus marking was tested in Hungarian were focus typic...
متن کاملThe effect of external attentional focus instructions with different distances on balance and muscular activity amongst children with mental retardation
Objective: The aim of this study was survey effect of distal and proximal external attentional focus instruction on postural sways and muscular electrical activity amongst children with mental retardation. Method: For this purpose, 30 child 10- 12 years old (M= 11.2) was selected from exceptional children schools and divided to three 10 persons groups (distal external attentional focus, proxima...
متن کاملProsodic encoding and perception of focus in Uygur
Abstract Prosodic encoding of focus in Uygur was experimentally studied. Speakers were asked to read aloud sentences in an appropriate way by emphasizing a corresponding word in a certain context. The perception of focus was also studied. Extensive acoustic analysis shows that, (1) Taken final-focus as the baseline, the encoding of focus on intonation in Uygur is similar to the tri-zone adjustm...
متن کاملActes d ’ IDP 09 109 Prosodic Markings of Information Focus in
This article addresses the controversial issue of the prosodic marking of Information Focus in French. We report the results of three experiments (one in production two in perception) that support three claims. The first one is empirical. Phrases that resolve a question may be set off by two types of intonational marks in French: they host the nuclear pitch accent (NPA) on their right edge and/...
متن کاملSyntax over focus
This paper compares three factors affecting prosodic phrasing in Korean: syntax, focus and speech rate. The Syntax and Focus constraints have been claimed to be stronger than the Speech Rate constraint, but it is not known which of these -the syntactic constraint (SYNTAX) or the focus constraint (FOCUS) – is stronger. Based on production and perception data, it is found that SYNTAX is stronger ...
متن کامل